Skype: theneemtreegroup
Phone: (Australian callers) 02-8003-4624
(international callers) +61-2-8003-4624
Email: http://neemtree.com.au/contact
Backing Drupal in a big way
Background
Assuming you've already realized that a CMS is the best way to publish your web content, you should be wondering what is already out there (so you can reuse! reuse! reuse!). That's where I was in mid-2006, and my 'due diligence' research relied on the following:
Matt Raible performed extensive evaluation of open source CMSs (parts I, II, and III). Beginning with installation (I), to customisation (II), through to implementation (III) he narrowed the field from 8 contenders (built on Java, Perl, and PHP) and finally went with Drupal.
I was also interested to read why Xaneon Development, a software consulting firm that developed for and contributed towards Mambo/Joomla, opted to switch to Drupal.
Following which, I downloaded and installed Drupal, and was hooked. Most recently, I have decided to invest in developing a service (details coming soon) that is very dependent on the growth and uptake of Drupal.
Why Drupal
To take advantage of our upcoming offerings, Drupal will be a requirement. So here's an updated look at why you should be considering Drupal.
The main players are the winners of Packt's 2007 open source CMS awards:
- Drupal: Flexible, extensible, and robust content management platform.
- Joomla: Flexible, simple, customizable content management system.
- Wordpress: Usability focussed 'personal publishing platform' that is expanding from blogging to full content management.
Before we move on to what others say about the Drupal (v 5.x upwards), Joomla (v 1.x), Wordpress (v 2,x) showdown, here are my observations (I focus on Drupal, if you see factual errors regarding Joomla/Wordpress please let me know):
Installation
A pre-installation requirements for all three applications is a MySql database. Drupal and Joomla use a web based installer to set the database configuration details, whereas Wordpress requires manual editing of their PHP configuration file.
User Management
All three applications support multiple user registration (with email verification), as well as multiple roles and role based levels of access. However, Wordpress restricts the roles to a predefined list, nor does it provide any control over the access levels. For example, Drupal roles are granted access (or not) to view content, add content, edit their own content, edit all content, etc.
Content Management
Wordpress and Joomla provide rich text editors for content editing out of the box. Plugin modules provide a variety of rich text editors (TinyMCE, WymEditor, WidgEditor, FCKEditor, etc) to choose from for Drupal, also these editors integrate with the IMCE plugin module for on-the-fly image uploading, resizing, and scaling.
Drupal also allows for the creation of content 'types'. For example, in addition to adding blog posts, you can add article posts, yourowntype posts, and excercise fine grained control of the display and user access of each. This enables Drupal to offer another out-of-the-box benefit: discussion forums. A single installation of Drupal also supports multiple websites (e.g. http://alibrary.neemtree.com.au and http://neemtree.com.au).
Visuals/Usability
Joomla and Wordpress have a variety of free themes to choose from, as well as burgeoning commercial theme development services. Theme developers are empowered by the ease of making new Joomla templates and Wordpress themes. Drupal has fewer free theme offerings, and like Wordpress (and unlike Joomla) aggregates them on drupal.org. Drupal has proved to be less appealing to commercial theme developers, although there are provide project-based custom services, but fewer stock templates/themes.
Extensibility
Developers are able to extend Drupal, Joomla, and Wordpress by creating modules, extensions, and plugins (respectively). As mentioned in the earlier articles, Drupal's API is popular with module developers. As a result, it currently offers 2521 community contributed modules to Joomla's 2299 extensions and Wordpress's 1204 plugins.
SEO/SMO
Out of the box, Drupal and Wordpress offer search engine friendly features such as content tags, meaningful URLs (vs http://site/?q=23) and all three have RSS publishing.
Those are some of the points of difference, lets see what the rest of the web thinks. We'll start with Drupal vs Wordpress:
- October 2007 Mike Stopforth referees a few rounds of Wordpress vs Drupal
- September 2007 Bivings Report's Todd Zeigler on when to use Wordpress or Drupal
- March 2007 Linux.com's evaluation as to which is better for blogging.
- November 2006 Wim Monstrey's comparison on the points of installation, features, customizability, and 'behind the scenes'.
And moving on to Drupal vs Joomla:
- March 2007 Communicopia's Drupal vs Joomla
- December 2006 Alledia's blow by blow comparison of Drupal (older v4.7) vs Joomla
- August 2006 Dries Buytaert's performance statistics
We're working on creating a service for Drupal providers and consumers, which implicitly relies on Drupal continuing to grow. Our project should plug in to a positive feedback loop, and assist with that growth, but for newcomers and evaluators we hope this article has swayed you the Drupal way.
There is some truth to the general advice that each of these applications fits different needs, but as they evolve (Drupal's improved UI and blogging capabilities, Wordpress' CMS-like plugins) newcomers won't find it any easier to differentiate between them. If you're looking for a full featured web content management tool (or if you want to be prepared to leverage those features in the future), you should be looking to Drupal:
- Drupal's much-complimented architecture, and why you care:
- It's stable and allows for better performance
- It's easy to develop feature extending modules, attracting module contributors (2521 and counting) and shortening development time for your own customisations (less time == lower costs).
- Its easily skinnable, and unlike Wordpress where theme's are 'plugin enabled', changing your theme doesn't affect functionality.
- It gives you control over who sees, adds, and edits what content.
- And, it does the 'basics'
- user registration, role based priveleges
- rich text editor, image uploading
- search engine friendly, and social media marketing addons
Happy Drupalling!

















Comments
I find your blog very interesting. I think it is very important to touch crucial subjects. Thank you very much that you dispose useful information! Wish you a good continuation and see you soon with your new writings!
flex video chat
I guess Drupal Is getting very famous Now a days and it won't be far before that it is going to beat ever press in the internet including wordpress
Unfortunately we cant use Drupal as a cms for e-learning, but anyway I see even facebook analogues on Drupal
My experience has led me to only use Wordpress and Joomla and they are distictively different and I think they should be treated that way in their own respective way. Joomla is a beast of a CMS and should not cater as a blog, wordpress has been designed in that fashion. For our joomla tutorial site which offers a forum, download manager, membership areas the Joomla is ideal which wordpress could not fully cater for.
While sometimes the developers miss the whiz-bang features that might be in the newest version of something, I find that with just a little extra work I can usually accomplish what I wanted to do is more simple then replacing some appliance parts or something like that. Innovation is seldom hindered by platform.
I personally love wordpress. This is an amazing (from my point of view) Its easy, strong
community to discuss the issues, great list of plugins and themes. Maybe, there is a reason
to love wordpress is I never tried anything else.
Can anyone tell me where a CMS fits in with the technology for creating websites when compared to using the .NET platform or MS's latest release, Expression Web?
Thanks
Some developers consider Drupal to have a significant learning curve compared to other CMS software. In particular, the complexity of its configuration options and the spartan appearance of a newly installed site are often compared to WordPress and Joomla. projecten
Found elsewhere:
Another blogger provides a concise list as to why they prefer Drupal over Joomla.
LinkedIn Answers to a request for comments on Drupal.
And a great excerpt from a blogger who has experimented with more than just the Big Three:
From IBM, published in 2006, but no mention of which versions were evaluated:
And from Selecting an Open Source Content Management Solution 3 Jan 2008:

Explanation regarding registering and comments - We are currently only providing logins to our clients. We will enable anonymous comments shortly, but don't let things stop you from sharing: http://neemtree.com.au/contact
Telecentre.org (a non-profit organisation working on providing telecentres, i.e. public spaces where people can access computers, the Internet, and other digital technologies) performed a detailed evaluation of a number of community web platforms:
Short story: They went with Drupal!
Didn't make the shortlist: Ekton, Kintera, MCMS, Red Dot, Sharepoint, SiteRefresh
Shortlisted and reviewd in detail: APC ActionApps, Mambo, Plone, SocialText, Userland Manila, TIG (Taking it Global), Drupal.
In detail: http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/telecentre-platform
personally love wordpress. This is an amazing (from my point of view) Its easy, strong
community to discuss the issues, great list of plugins and themes. Maybe, there is a reason.
Post new comment